Skip to content
SuperMoney logo
SuperMoney logo

Trickle-Down Effect: Definition, How it Works, and Real-World Applications

Last updated 03/28/2024 by

Alessandra Nicole

Edited by

Fact checked by

Summary:
The trickle-down effect is a multifaceted concept in marketing that influences the flow of fashion trends, consumer products, and advertising. It encompasses how trends cascade from the upper class to the lower class, the pricing evolution of products, and the dissemination of advertisements through viral marketing. This comprehensive article delves deeper into the mechanism of the trickle-down effect, its historical context, and its application in various dimensions, including fashion. It clarifies the distinction between the trickle-down effect and the trickle-down theory in economics. Real-world examples illustrate its impact, and a dedicated FAQ section addresses common queries related to this marketing phenomenon.

Understanding the trickle-down effect

The trickle-down effect is a multifaceted concept that manifests in various aspects of marketing. It’s essential to grasp its different dimensions:

Fashion trends

In the realm of fashion, the trickle-down effect denotes a process where specific trends originate in the upper echelons of society and gradually percolate through the layers, eventually becoming accepted by lower social strata. This phenomenon is driven by the aspiration of individuals from lower classes to emulate the fashions of the upper classes. They seek to lay claim to a higher status by adopting the trends set by the affluent. Concurrently, the upper classes continually endeavor to differentiate themselves by introducing or embracing new fashion trends. This dynamic results in a perpetual cycle of innovation and transformation in the world of fashion.

Consumer products

The trickle-down effect is not confined to fashion alone; it extends to consumer products. When a new product is introduced to the market, it often carries a premium price tag, making it accessible primarily to the affluent. However, as the product matures and production processes become more efficient, its price gradually decreases. This decline in price renders the product more accessible to a broader consumer base, allowing it to penetrate the mass market. This evolution from exclusivity to wider adoption exemplifies the trickle-down effect in the context of consumer goods.

Viral marketing

In advertising, the trickle-down effect comes into play when an advertisement spreads rapidly through word of mouth or viral marketing. This dissemination hinges on the unique qualities of the ad, such as its originality, humor, entertainment value, or other remarkable attributes that prompt people to share it with their social circles. When the trickle-down effect takes hold, it can generate extensive exposure for a company within a short timeframe, often at a relatively low cost. Social media platforms, in particular, have become pivotal channels for this phenomenon. An advertisement that goes viral on these platforms can garner mass media coverage, effectively bypassing the conventional costs associated with mainstream advertising.

How the trickle-down effect works

The essence of the trickle-down effect in advertising lies in the presumption that social classes are influenced by those occupying higher social strata. The lower social classes aspire to mimic the styles and trends of the upper classes as a means of staking their claim to a higher social status. In contrast, the upper social classes aim to distinguish themselves by introducing or adopting new fashion trends. This mutual behavior stimulates innovation and constant change in fashion and trends. In the realm of advertising, the trickle-down effect particularly thrives in the context of viral marketing, which primarily leverages social media platforms.
For the trickle-down effect to take hold, an advertisement must possess exceptional appeal. This can stem from its uniqueness, humor, entertainment value, or other distinguishing traits that resonate with viewers. When individuals find an advertisement captivating, they are inclined to share it with their friends, family, and coworkers. This sharing amplifies the reach of the advertisement, leading to a significant level of exposure for the company, often at a minimal cost.

History of the trickle-down effect

The origins of the trickle-down effect can be traced back to the 19th century, with the work of Rudolf von Jhering. He was among the first to write about cultural diffusion and the way fashions filter down from the upper classes to the lower classes. Central to von Jhering’s perspective was the idea that the value of a fashion trend diminishes as it becomes pervasive. Consequently, the upper classes find themselves compelled to explore and adopt new fashion trends, which, in time, percolate through the lower social strata.
Further insight into the trickle-down effect was provided by Thorstein Veblen in his work “The Theory of the Leisure Class.” Veblen introduced the concept of conspicuous consumption, asserting that individuals purchase luxury goods and services to showcase their wealth to others.
In a more contemporary context, the trickle-down effect has expanded its application beyond social classes. It is now used to analyze the diffusion of trends in terms of age, ethnicity, or gender. Notably, Grand McCracken’s work on “Culture and Consumption” delves into this modern adaptation.

Trickle down vs. trickle across vs. trickle up

The trickle-down effect holds significant theoretical implications in the world of fashion, which is often likened to a dynamic “movement” involving the flow of trends from one aspect of life to another. This movement can be categorized in various ways, including the following:

Trickle-down

Trickle-down in the fashion world characterizes a scenario in which specific trends are initially embraced by individuals in the uppermost social class. Over time, these trends gradually gain acceptance among individuals in lower social classes. For the trickle-down effect to be effective, the society in question typically follows a hierarchical structure, with a prevalent desire for upward mobility. Two fundamental assumptions underpin the trickle-down concept:
  • Individuals at the apex of society seek to distinguish themselves from those in lower strata and consistently search for means to set new trends.
  • Individuals in lower social strata aspire to align with the affluent segments of society and, consequently, adopt the fashion trends established by the upper class.
Under the trickle-down paradigm, emulating the styles of those in high society offers a relatively straightforward path for individuals to signal their upward mobility. However, when a particular trend saturates the market, the upper social strata typically dismiss it as outdated and opt for new trends.

Trickle-across

Trickle-across movement pertains to the lateral spread of fashion trends between groups that occupy similar social strata. In this model, peers become trendsetters for their peers, as opposed to trends exclusively emanating from the most affluent individuals. Under this framework, specific fashion trends propagate rapidly from one group to another. Several factors contribute to this phenomenon, including the advent of rapid mass communication methods, coordinated marketing campaigns by manufacturers and retailers, and natural trend adoption by fashion designers themselves.

Trickle-up

The trickle-up pattern stands in contrast to the trickle-down movement. It entails fashion trends and styles originating in lower-income groups, often referred to as the “streets,” and subsequently making their way up through the social hierarchy. In this model, the imp
etus behind these trends is comfort and practicality. This approach challenges the conventional trickle-down ideology, with working-class fashion influencing what eventually attains widespread recognition as fashionable casual attire.
For instance, renowned designer Chanel is a staunch proponent of the trickle-up distribution pattern. Many of her designs were rooted in the need for working women to have functional and comfortable attire. Everyday items like pea coats, khaki pants, and t-shirts, initially worn by working-class individuals, have now become staples in the realm of fashionable casual wear.

Trickle-down effect vs. trickle-down theory

It’s imperative to distinguish the trickle-down effect from the trickle-down theory in economics, as both concepts involve the transfer of influence and resources but operate in entirely different domains:
Trickle-down effect: This pertains to the flow of trends, products, and advertisements within the realm of marketing. It revolves around how fashion trends progress, how product prices evolve, and how advertising spreads through viral marketing.
Trickle-down theory (economics): In contrast, the trickle-down theory in economics is centered on the belief that incentivizing the wealthy and businesses with tax cuts will stimulate economic growth, ultimately benefiting society as a whole. This theory suggests that higher economic growth will have positive repercussions for all members of society.
The trickle-down theory is closely associated with the principles of supply-side economics, sometimes referred to as Reaganomics. These principles advocate for widespread tax cuts, reductions in social spending, and deregulation as a means of fostering economic growth.

Example of the trickle-down effect

An illustrative modern example of the trickle-down effect can be observed in the context of social media. Influencers on platforms like Instagram have the power to catalyze fashion trends with a single post. A prime instance of this occurred in 2018 when Kim Kardashian posted a photograph of herself donning a neon pink Yeezy dress for her half-sister Kylie Jenner’s 21st birthday celebration. This single post triggered a notable fashion trend that swiftly proliferated onto runways, fashion brands, and retail outlets. Following Kardashian’s post, there was a reported 743% surge in the sale of neon products within a short period.
WEIGH THE RISKS AND BENEFITS
Here is a list of the benefits and the drawbacks to consider.
Pros
  • Stimulates innovation and change in fashion and trends.
  • Allows individuals to signal upward mobility.
  • Facilitates the dissemination of trends and ideas.
Cons
  • May perpetuate social hierarchies.
  • Can promote excessive consumerism and superficiality.
  • Overemphasis on trends may stifle individuality.

Frequently asked questions

How does the trickle-down effect bring change to society?

The trickle-down effect facilitates change in society through a hierarchical system where each social class is influenced by those in higher social classes. Change materializes when the uppermost social group decides to distinguish itself by introducing new trends or adopting existing ones. This change subsequently permeates lower social strata.

What is trickle-down communication?

Trickle-down communication is a form of organizational communication where leaders distribute messages and information to those directly below them within the hierarchy. This information is then cascaded through the organization, creating a flow of communication from the upper echelons to the lower levels.

How can brands effectively utilize the trickle-down effect?

Brands can leverage the trickle-down effect by creating marketing campaigns that resonate with their target audience. A compelling advertisement, social media buzz, or influential endorsements can spark the spread of trends from upper classes to lower classes. It’s crucial for brands to stay attuned to cultural shifts and the preferences of their target demographics to effectively harness this marketing phenomenon.

Is the trickle-down effect limited to fashion and consumer products?

No, the trickle-down effect extends beyond fashion and consumer products. It can be observed in various domains, including technology, entertainment, and even cultural phenomena. Any trend or innovation that originates in one segment of society and gradually permeates through others can be categorized under the umbrella of the trickle-down effect.

Are there downsides to the trickle-down effect?

While the trickle-down effect can drive innovation and cultural change, it is not without its drawbacks. One potential drawback is the perpetuation of social hierarchies, as it relies on the emulation of the upper classes by the lower classes. Additionally, there can be an overemphasis on trends, which may lead to a culture of consumerism and superficiality.

Key takeaways

  • The trickle-down effect encompasses the flow of fashion trends, consumer products, and advertising from upper to lower social strata.
  • It fosters innovation and change in fashion and trends, enabling individuals to signal upward mobility.
  • The effect operates not only in fashion but also in consumer products, viral marketing, and various other domains.
  • Trickle-down, trickle-across, and trickle-up are different models that describe how trends spread in society.
  • It’s distinct from the trickle-down theory in economics, which concerns tax breaks and economic growth.

Share this post:

You might also like