What is a Tick? Understanding Price Movements in Securities
AB
Summary:
Delve into the intricacies of ticks in the financial world, where a tick represents the smallest price movement of a security. This exploration includes the historical evolution of tick sizes, the impact of decimalization, and the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) experiments with tick size changes. Uncover how ticks influence liquidity, market dynamics, and the direction of stock prices, with a focus on the results of the SEC’s tick size pilot program. This comprehensive guide aims to provide a thorough understanding of ticks in the context of financial markets.
Get Competing Personal Loan Offers In Minutes
Compare rates from multiple vetted lenders. Discover your lowest eligible rate.
It's quick, free and won’t hurt your credit score
What is ticks?
A tick is the minimum incremental change in the price of a security, serving as a fundamental unit for price fluctuations. The concept became particularly relevant with the introduction of decimalization in 2001, impacting the minimum tick size for stocks trading above $1, which is now one cent. This shift aimed to enhance precision and liquidity in the market, but it also triggered significant changes in trading dynamics.
Evolution of tick sizes
Prior to April 2001, the minimum tick size was 1/16th of a dollar, limiting price increments to $0.0625. Decimalization brought about positive changes, such as narrower bid-ask spreads and improved price discovery. However, it also transformed market-making into a less profitable and riskier activity, reshaping the landscape for investors and market participants.
How ticks work
Tick sizes are not universal; they vary based on the market and the type of security. For example, the E-mini S&P 500 futures contract has a designated tick size of $0.25, meaning the price can move in increments of $0.25. The SEC’s 2015 pilot plan aimed to widen tick sizes for 1,200 small-cap stocks, intending to promote research and trading in these companies. However, the results of the pilot program revealed a nuanced impact on liquidity and trading costs.
Imagine a futures contract on the E-mini S&P 500 listed at $20. With a tick size of $0.25, the price can move upward by one tick, reaching $20.25. However, it cannot move to $20.10 as that is below the designated tick size.
Results of the SEC’s tick size pilot program
The SEC’s tick size pilot program, initiated in 2015 and concluding in 2018, was an attempt to explore the impact of tick size changes, particularly for small-cap stocks. The pilot program involved widening tick sizes for selected securities, with the goal of boosting liquidity and market activity in these stocks. However, the results were not as anticipated, leading to a decrease in liquidity in the limit order book and a noticeable decrease in stock prices for small spread stocks.
David Weild IV, an advocate for the JOBS Act, initially proposed increasing tick sizes for small-cap stocks to incentivize brokers to focus on these stocks. However, the program’s failure was attributed to substantial changes in stock markets, including the rise of discount brokers and DIY internet trading, which shifted the dynamics of market-making and trading costs.
Post-experiment reflection
The failure of the tick size pilot program prompted reflection on the broader changes in stock markets. The traditional model of market-making, dominated by large brokers, faced challenges as smaller brokers struggled with diminished tick spreads. Investors bore the increased costs of trading, ranging between $350 and $900 million, highlighting the complexities of implementing changes in market structure.
Tick as a movement indicator
Beyond its role as a unit of price change, a tick can also describe the direction of a stock’s price movement. An uptick indicates a trade at a higher price than the previous transaction, while a downtick indicates a trade at a lower price. The significance of these movements was evident in the now-eliminated uptick rule.
Elimination of the uptick rule
The uptick rule, eliminated by the SEC in 2007, was a trading restriction designed to curb short-selling during declining markets. The rule prohibited short-selling unless the last trade was an uptick, intending to alleviate downward pressure on a stock already in decline. However, the financial crisis that coincided with the elimination of the rule led to a reconsideration of its impact.
Instead of reinstating the old rule, the SEC introduced an alternative uptick rule to prevent excessive selling pressure on stocks that had fallen more than 10% in a day. This decision reflected the evolving nature of market regulations and the need for adaptive measures to address changing market conditions.
Frequently asked questions
How did decimalization impact tick sizes?
Decimalization, introduced in 2001, led to a significant change in tick sizes. For stocks trading above $1, the minimum tick size became one cent, enhancing precision in price movements.
What was the purpose of the SEC’s tick size pilot program?
The SEC’s tick size pilot program aimed to explore the impact of tick size changes on small-cap stocks. It sought to boost liquidity and market activity in these stocks by widening tick sizes for a selected group of securities.
Why did the tick size pilot program fail?
The tick size pilot program faced challenges due to tectonic changes in stock markets, including the rise of discount brokers and DIY internet trading. The program resulted in decreased liquidity and a noticeable decrease in stock prices for small spread stocks.
How did the elimination of the uptick rule impact trading?
The elimination of the uptick rule in 2007 removed a trading restriction on short-selling during declining markets. This decision was prompted by the financial crisis, leading to the introduction of an alternative uptick rule to address excessive selling pressure on stocks experiencing significant declines.
Key takeaways
- A tick is the minimum incremental change in the price of a security.
- Decimalization in 2001 led to a one-cent minimum tick size for stocks above $1.
- The SEC’s tick size pilot program aimed to boost liquidity but resulted in challenges.
- The elimination of the uptick rule in 2007 prompted the introduction of an alternative rule.
Share this post: