Skip to content
SuperMoney logo
SuperMoney logo

Lisbon Treaty: Impact and Global Reach

Last updated 03/19/2024 by

Silas Bamigbola

Edited by

Fact checked by

Summary:
The Lisbon Treaty, signed in 2007, revamped EU regulations, centralizing leadership, establishing exit procedures, and streamlining policy enactment. This article delves deeper into its history, impact, and opinions.

The Lisbon treaty: Decoding its significance

The Lisbon Treaty, also referred to as the Treaty of Lisbon, marked a pivotal moment in European Union history. Signed in Lisbon, Portugal, on December 13, 2007, it not only updated existing regulations but also introduced fundamental changes to the EU’s structure, governance, and decision-making processes.

Before the Lisbon treaty

The Lisbon Treaty didn’t emerge in isolation; it built upon the foundations laid by previous treaties, namely the Treaty of Rome (1957) and the Maastricht Treaty (1992).

Treaty of Rome (1957)

Signed in 1957, the Treaty of Rome established the European Economic Community (EEC), fostering economic integration among member countries.

Maastricht treaty (1992)

The Maastricht Treaty, signed in 1992, set the stage for the euro and solidified the pillars of the European Union, marking a significant step towards European unity.

Current impact of the Lisbon treaty

As of the present day, the Lisbon Treaty continues to shape the dynamics of the European Union. Its impact is felt across various spheres, from foreign affairs to legislative processes. Let’s explore some key areas where the treaty has left a lasting imprint:

Foreign affairs and security policy

Article 18, which established the role of the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, plays a pivotal role in shaping the EU’s stance on the global stage. The High Representative, elected through majority voting, carries the responsibility of overseeing the Union’s foreign affairs and security initiatives.

Global diplomacy

Article 21 outlines the EU’s global diplomatic policy, emphasizing principles of universal human rights, democracy, and development. This commitment has led to the forging of alliances with nations sharing similar values, showcasing the EU’s dedication to promoting these fundamental principles worldwide.

Exit procedures and challenges

Article 50, which lays out the procedures for a member country to leave the EU, gained prominence during the Brexit negotiations. The challenges and complexities faced during the United Kingdom’s exit highlighted the intricacies involved in untangling a country from the union.

Assessing the criticisms

While the Lisbon Treaty has undoubtedly brought about significant changes, it hasn’t been without its share of criticisms. Some argue that the centralization of power may lead to a democratic deficit, with concerns about decision-making being concentrated in a few key figures. Additionally, the perceived unequal distribution of power among member states continues to be a point of contention.

Power dynamics and checks

Supporters of the treaty contend that the system of checks and balances introduced enhances accountability. The increased influence given to the European Parliament is seen as a positive step towards a more democratic and transparent European Union.

Future implications

As the European Union evolves, the implications of the Lisbon Treaty will continue to unfold. Its provisions and mechanisms will likely be subject to further scrutiny and potential reforms, reflecting the ever-changing landscape of European politics and governance.

Evolutionary impact on EU legislation

Beyond the immediate changes outlined in key articles, the Lisbon Treaty ushered in a new era of legislative evolution within the European Union. This section explores how the treaty influenced and streamlined the legislative process, fostering a more responsive and adaptable legislative framework.

Enhanced legislative efficiency

One notable impact of the Lisbon Treaty is the streamlining of legislative procedures. Articles such as Article 289 paved the way for the delegation of legislative acts to the European Commission, enhancing efficiency by allowing expert bodies to focus on specific policy areas. This evolution in the legislative process aimed to address the increasing complexity of policy domains within the EU.

Democratic accountability and citizen involvement

The Lisbon Treaty introduced mechanisms to strengthen democratic accountability and citizen involvement in the legislative process. Article 11 emphasized the importance of transparency, openness, and dialogue between institutions and citizens. Additionally, the expanded powers of the European Parliament, as highlighted in Article 14, provided a platform for elected representatives to actively participate in shaping legislation, ensuring a more inclusive and responsive legislative system.

Challenges and adaptations: lessons from Brexit

The departure of the United Kingdom from the European Union, commonly known as Brexit, brought to light the challenges and adaptations required under the Lisbon Treaty. This section delves into the lessons learned from this significant event and its implications for the EU’s future.

The unraveling of article 50

While Article 50 provided a structured framework for a member state’s voluntary withdrawal, the complexities and challenges faced during the Brexit negotiations highlighted areas that required further clarification. The EU, in response, initiated discussions on potential amendments to Article 50, aiming to address unforeseen challenges and ensure a smoother process for any future exits.

Resilience and unity: post-Brexit EU dynamics

The aftermath of Brexit showcased the EU’s resilience and determination to adapt. Articles such as Article 48, which outlines the procedure for treaty amendments, became a focal point for discussions on reinforcing the union’s unity. The EU’s ability to navigate the challenges presented by Brexit demonstrated the treaty’s adaptability and its role in maintaining cohesion among member states.

The Lisbon treaty: a global perspective

While the Lisbon Treaty primarily focuses on shaping the European Union, its global impact and implications extend beyond the borders of the EU. This section explores how the treaty’s provisions influence international relations and global governance.

EU as a global actor: article 21 in action

Article 21, outlining the EU’s global diplomatic policy, positioned the union as a significant global actor. The principles of universal human rights, democracy, and development guided the EU’s interactions with other nations. Examples include collaborations on climate change initiatives, humanitarian efforts, and partnerships with countries sharing common values.

Challenges in global partnerships: striking a balance

While the Lisbon Treaty encourages the EU to forge alliances, challenges arise in balancing global partnerships with diverse geopolitical interests. Article 21’s commitment to universal principles requires careful navigation in a world where conflicting values and priorities may impact the EU’s ability to maintain harmonious relationships with all global actors.

Conclusion

As we reflect on the multifaceted impact of the Lisbon Treaty, it becomes evident that its influence extends far beyond the initial restructuring of EU regulations. The treaty’s ongoing evolution in legislative processes, lessons learned from significant events like Brexit, and its global perspective underline its role in shaping the European Union’s ability to adapt to an ever-changing global landscape.

Frequently asked questions

What were the main motivations behind the drafting and signing of the Lisbon Treaty?

The Lisbon Treaty aimed to address issues of efficiency, centralization, and decision-making within the European Union. It sought to create a more unified and responsive EU structure.

How did the Lisbon Treaty impact the balance of power among EU member states?

The Lisbon Treaty introduced changes in power dynamics, particularly through articles like Article 14, which expanded the role of the European Parliament. However, debates persist over the potential imbalance in influence among member states.

What role does Article 50 play in the Lisbon Treaty, and how was it influenced by Brexit?

Article 50 outlines the procedures for a member state to leave the EU. The challenges faced during the Brexit process prompted discussions on potential amendments to Article 50, reflecting on the treaty’s adaptability.

How has the Lisbon Treaty impacted the legislative efficiency of the European Union?

The Lisbon Treaty brought about changes in legislative procedures, such as the delegation of acts to the European Commission (Article 289). This aimed at enhancing efficiency by focusing on expert bodies for specific policy areas.

What criticisms have been raised regarding the Lisbon Treaty’s impact on democratic accountability?

Critics argue that the centralization of power may lead to a democratic deficit. The increased influence given to the European Parliament (Article 14) is a point of contention, raising concerns about decision-making being concentrated in a few key figures.

How does the Lisbon Treaty address unforeseen challenges, as exemplified by Brexit?

The Lisbon Treaty demonstrated its adaptability through events like Brexit. Discussions on potential amendments to Article 50 and the focus on reinforcing unity (Article 48) highlight the treaty’s ability to address unforeseen challenges.

What global impact does the Lisbon Treaty have, and how does Article 21 contribute to this?

The Lisbon Treaty’s global perspective, outlined in Article 21, positions the EU as a significant global actor. This includes collaborations on climate change initiatives, humanitarian efforts, and partnerships with countries sharing common values.

Key takeaways

  • The Lisbon Treaty revamped EU regulations, centralizing leadership and streamlining policy enactment.
  • It replaced the rejected Constitutional Treaty, aiming to establish a Union constitution.
  • Key articles, such as Article 18 and Article 50, introduced significant changes, affecting foreign affairs and exit procedures.
  • The treaty officially took effect in December 2009, two years after its signing.

Share this post:

You might also like