Regulatory Accounting Principles (RAP): Understanding, Impact, and Examples
BP
Summary:
Regulatory accounting principles (RAP) were introduced by the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB) in the 1980s for the savings and loan industry. However, they led to disastrous results and were eliminated after the savings and loan crisis. RAP allowed thrifts to employ relaxed accounting procedures, contributing to artificial increases in reported profits and net worth. This article explores the origins, flaws, and aftermath of RAP, highlighting its impact on the financial industry.
Regulatory accounting principles (RAP) emerged during the 1980s under the jurisdiction of the Federal Home Loan Bank Board (FHLBB). Intended to assist low net-worth savings and loan associations in meeting capital requirements, RAP introduced relaxed accounting rules to the thrifts industry. However, these principles ultimately proved disastrous, contributing to the savings and loan crisis of the late 1980s.
Compare Savings Accounts
Compare savings accounts. Discover your best option.
Understanding regulatory accounting principles (RAP)
Flawed accounting procedures
The relaxed rules of RAP enabled many otherwise insolvent institutions to artificially increase their reported profits and net worth. Some of the egregious accounting principles that the thrifts were permitted to apply included:
- Recording a loss from a sale of a mortgage loan as an asset that could be amortized over the remaining life of the mortgage.
- Entire and immediate recognition of income from construction loan fees.
- Inclusion of “appraised equity capital” for calculation of regulatory net worth.
- Forty-year goodwill amortization of acquired thrifts.
Impact of regulatory accounting principles (RAP)
The flawed application of RAP contributed to the artificial inflation of thrifts’ reported profits and net worth. For instance, recording losses as assets and immediate recognition of income misrepresented the true financial health of these institutions. Moreover, the selective inclusion of appraised equity capital and extended goodwill amortization periods further distorted financial statements.
The aftermath of the savings and loan crisis
Congressional intervention
In response to the savings and loan crisis, Congress took decisive action to address the systemic issues. The Resolution Trust Corporation was established to manage and dispose of failed thrift institutions, while surviving thrifts were mandated to transition to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
Examples of regulatory accounting principles (RAP) in action
Illustrating the application of regulatory accounting principles (RAP) can provide insight into how these principles influenced the financial landscape during the 1980s. Here are a few examples:
Mortgage loan sale amortization
Consider a thrift institution faced with declining market values of its long-term mortgage assets. Under RAP, the institution could record losses from the sale of mortgage loans as assets and amortize them over the remaining life of the mortgage. This allowed the institution to artificially boost its reported net worth despite actual financial losses.
Construction loan fee recognition
A thrift engaged in real estate financing might originate construction loans and earn fees upfront. RAP permitted the institution to recognize the entire income from these fees immediately, disregarding the need to match income recognition with the costs incurred in originating the loans. This practice inflated reported profits, masking underlying financial weaknesses.
The impact of regulatory accounting principles (RAP) on financial markets
The unraveling of the savings and loan industry
As thrift institutions leveraged regulatory accounting principles (RAP) to artificially inflate their reported profits and net worth, the stability of the savings and loan industry was undermined. Investors and regulators, relying on misleading financial statements, failed to grasp the true risks inherent in these institutions. Consequently, the industry experienced a catastrophic collapse, precipitating widespread economic repercussions.
The transition to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP)
In the wake of the savings and loan crisis, the adoption of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) represented a crucial shift towards transparency and accountability in financial reporting. GAAP’s rigorous standards sought to restore investor confidence and safeguard the integrity of financial markets. By replacing the flawed practices of RAP with universally recognized accounting principles, regulators aimed to prevent future crises and promote long-term financial stability.
Conclusion
Regulatory accounting principles (RAP) emerged as a well-intentioned effort to assist struggling savings and loan associations during the 1980s. However, the relaxed accounting rules allowed under RAP ultimately proved to be a double-edged sword, contributing to the systemic weaknesses and eventual collapse of the savings and loan industry.
Frequently asked questions
What were the primary objectives of regulatory accounting principles?
The primary objectives of regulatory accounting principles (RAP) were to assist low net-worth savings and loan associations in meeting capital requirements and to provide temporary relief for struggling institutions.
How did regulatory accounting principles contribute to the savings and loan crisis?
Regulatory accounting principles (RAP) contributed to the savings and loan crisis by allowing thrifts to employ relaxed accounting procedures, artificially inflating reported profits and net worth. This misrepresentation of financial health masked underlying solvency issues, exacerbating the crisis.
Why were regulatory accounting principles ultimately eliminated?
Regulatory accounting principles (RAP) were ultimately eliminated in response to the disastrous outcomes of the savings and loan crisis. The flawed application of RAP led to widespread economic repercussions, prompting Congress to intervene and transition thrifts to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
What were some examples of flawed accounting procedures permitted under regulatory accounting principles?
Flawed accounting procedures permitted under regulatory accounting principles (RAP) included recording losses from mortgage loan sales as assets, immediate recognition of income from construction loan fees, selective inclusion of appraised equity capital, and extended goodwill amortization periods.
How did the adoption of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) impact the financial industry?
The adoption of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) represented a crucial shift towards transparency and accountability in the financial industry. By replacing the flawed practices of regulatory accounting principles (RAP) with universally recognized accounting standards, GAAP aimed to restore investor confidence and promote long-term financial stability.
What lessons can be learned from the regulatory accounting principles era?
The regulatory accounting principles era serves as a cautionary tale about the importance of prudent regulation and sound accounting practices in preserving the integrity of the financial system. It underscores the need for transparency, accountability, and regulatory oversight to prevent future crises and protect investors and institutions alike.
Key takeaways
- Regulatory accounting principles (RAP) were introduced in the 1980s to assist savings and loan associations.
- RAP allowed for relaxed accounting procedures, contributing to artificial increases in reported profits and net worth.
- The flawed application of RAP was a contributing factor to the savings and loan crisis of the late 1980s.
- Congressional intervention led to the elimination of RAP and the transition to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
Share this post: